# Sanitized reporting plan

Plan locked: 2026-09-04T15:14:30Z

Source snapshot first accessed for the joint extraction: 2026-09-04T15:15:59Z

## Prior knowledge

HJ versus UTG had already been used as a feasibility check before this plan was locked. Its values were therefore known. The other three matched comparisons and the joint four-spot result had not yet been extracted.

## Fixed setup

- 6-max regular no-limit Hold’em cash game
- Equal 50bb and 100bb effective-stack profiles
- No ante or straddle; 5% rake capped at 4bb
- Open to 2.5bb; response options fold, call, raise to 7.5bb, or all-in
- Physical-combination weighting across 1,326 starting combinations

## Fixed comparisons

1. Under the gun opens; hijack responds.
2. Under the gun opens; hijack folds; cutoff responds.
3. Under the gun opens; hijack and cutoff fold; button responds.
4. Under the gun and hijack fold; cutoff opens; button responds.

These four pairs were selected to cover the full non-blind responder chain versus an under-the-gun open plus a late-position button-versus-cutoff contrast. The set is deliberately nonexhaustive. Each pair holds the action history constant and changes only stack depth.

## Fixed outputs

Report every planned comparison, including a reversal. For each pair, publish the combination-weighted call rate at both depths, the absolute and relative change, and overlap and non-overlap relative to the smaller calling range. Do not publish hand-level matrices, selected hand cells, internal identifiers, storage locations, hashes, or EV arrays.

This public file is a sanitized copy of an internally timestamped plan, not independent proof of its timestamp.